Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

A. The punishment imposed by Defendant B (the fine of KRW 500,000) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant A (1) misunderstanding of facts) Defendant A did not invite members to commit a crime as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and only tried to fight in body with the residents’ body. (2) The sentence (one million won of fine) sentenced by the lower court of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal ex officio, the prosecutor applied for changes in indictment with respect to the facts charged in this case at the trial court as follows. Since the subject of the judgment was changed by this court's permission, the judgment of the court below was no longer maintained.

[1] The revised facts charged] 1. Defendant A demanded that the contents of the redevelopment association resolution be null and void between October 23, 2013 and 21:05 on the fifth floor of the office building of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, the fifth floor of the office building located in Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, to be the fifth floor of the office building of Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and thus interfered with the legitimate execution of the duties of public officials belonging to the Yangcheon-gu, the Yangcheon-gu Office by assaulting the staff of the office of Yangcheon-gu, such as whether there is a reason to prevent entry into the office of the head of the Gu, how to see it as soon as possible, and how to see it as soon as possible, and the public officials belonging to the office of Yangcheon-gu, including theO that restrains entry into the office of the head of the Gu into the office.