beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고단1459

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. C’s act of violating the vehicle operation restriction on the road on September 8, 1997, 11:54, which is the employee of the specific defendant in the facts charged, on the roads of the 904 Eup-Myeon-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong. 2. The penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on December 29, 201 are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga38, Oct. 28, 2010; 2008Hun-Ga17, Jul. 30, 2009]. As such, the penal provisions applied to the summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.