All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment without prison labor) against the defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. The Defendant’s sentence is inevitable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s negligence is very large in the occurrence of the instant fire; (b) the Defendant’s negligence was caused by the occurrence of the instant fire; (c) the occurrence of human life was likely to cause secondary damage to the surrounding buildings; (d) the risk was serious; and (e) the Defendant did not agree with the victims up to the trial.

I would like to say.

However, considering all of the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, the background of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below is appropriate, and since it is not too heavy or too unreasonable, the defendant and the prosecutor's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.