Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the

[Plaintiff’s assertion that this court had a more rest time than the agreed upon between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the employees of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff suffered damage to the Plaintiff’s sales by refusing the customer’s position on the ground of the closure of the business prior to the closure of the order. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was an agreement on the operation of the rest time as alleged by the Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Defendant or the employees of the Plaintiff and C, and the Plaintiff asserted that there was a break time based on CCTV video images not visible to the Defendant or employees, but as long as there was a place where CCTV was not installed, it cannot be readily concluded that the Defendant and the employees were not permanently recorded in CCTV, on the ground that the Defendant and the employees did not enter the rest time, and that the employees were refusing to enter the rest time, and that there was no evidence to support that the sales decline compared with the sales amount during the previous year was due to the Defendant’s mistake, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit. The Plaintiff’s claim of this case is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.