beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.27 2018고단306

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CK5-type taxi.

On November 26, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi on November 26, 2017, and led the front road of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to go straight at the erogate from the surface of the river basin to the erogate.

On the other hand, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and to check whether the defendant is a motor vehicle driving through the intersection by properly examining the traffic conditions on the front side and the right side and right side, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals so as to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected that the ongoing signal was changed to the stop signal, and the Defendant received the front pent part of the victim E(60) driver’s car in front of the Frane car, who opened the intersection from the right side of the proceeding to the left side in accordance with the new code, from the right side of the proceeding to the center on the right side of the Defendant driver’s taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the injury to the victim, such as finite finites, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, the injury to the victim G (the 21 year old), who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, such as cinite finites that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim H (the she was the passenger of the Defendant’s taxi) that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment to the victim H (the she was the she was the she was the she was the shee of 40 years old), such as finite finites and tensions in the part

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident in E, H and G preparation;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Photographs of an accident vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The crimes provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (in the case of a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims H with the largest criminal situation).