The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the facts charged in this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below erred by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by non-

There is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to "injury" in the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.