beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.12.20 2013고정1285

사기

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of 5,000,000 won, and a fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants were punished by fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A conspired to take part in the fraud crime committed by Defendant D with E and F after having made a false traffic accident. On January 6, 2010, Defendant A conspiredd to take part in the insurance money upon D’s request. On the roads near the Dong-dong Park, Daegu-gu, Seoul-dong Park, and F getting on and off a G car together with D, and Defendant A was under a stop on the roads near the Dong-dong Park Dong-dong, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu. On January 6, 2010. Defendant A was also paid KRW 3,494,450 in total with the insurance money by driving a H car, under which the said traffic accident occurred, including E, was the actual traffic accident, and the said F and D were pretended to have actually suffered actual injury, and the Defendant also claimed insurance money on the part of the Korea Commercialized Loss Insurance Co., Ltd., as if he was on board the said G car.

From that time until August 30, 2010, the Defendant conspiredd with D et al. accomplicess at a total of six times, such as the No. 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 of the list of crimes in attached Form 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 190 won in total.

2. Defendant B, along with D, I, and J, conspireded to receive insurance money by manipulating a false traffic accident as if the traffic accident occurred, and conspired to receive insurance money. On September 8, 2008, around the street near the Dong-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, the Defendant acquired KRW 2,282,600 from the sum of the insurance money by claiming insurance money to the victim’s on the side of the victim’s Dong-dong fire with the above D, etc., despite the absence of any traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Results of analyzing information on suspected insurance fraud by the Financial Supervisory Service;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against M, E, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X,Y, Z, AA, J, AB, I, and AC;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to AD, AE, AF, AG, AH and AI;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. A, the aggravated criminal defendant A: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.