도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The defendant was a driver of a vehicle by the summary of the grounds for appeal, and the defendant did not drive a vehicle by drinking.
Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty on the ground that it erred and convicted the Defendant.
2. The lower court determined as follows: ① the Defendant and the F husband and wife, at the 0th day of June 19, 2012, changed the following circumstances that may be recognized in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated at the lower court; ② the Defendant and the F husband and wife, who was at the 0th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 0th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the Ha.