However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the representative director of C, and Defendant B is a corporation that manufactures and sells cosmetics and subsidiary materials for living goods at the above address.

1. Around November 1, 2016, Defendant A employed 61 Chinese nationals, business Vietnam, and Russia, who did not have the status of employment status as indicated in the separate crime list, including employment status, from November 1, 2016 to March 7, 2017, at the place of business located C, and employed 61 Chinese employees, including D, F, and Russia, who had the status of employment status as described in the separate crime list, at the recommendation of D, which operated illegal employment brokerage companies for foreigners.

As a result, the defendant employed foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities but have no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

2. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant, employed 61 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn that he would engage in job-seeking activities like paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F, D, or G;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H (I), J, K, and L;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the adjustment data for the number of days of attendance at each work certificate, each work certificate, and each work certificate;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act; and Article 94 subparagraph 2 of the same Act and Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the same Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act; Defendant B who selects imprisonment: Each of the subparagraphs 2, 94 subparagraph 9, and 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B corporation with the provisional payment order: the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.