beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2017.11.01 2017고단271

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Category C cargo vehicles.

On August 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license of the said vehicle, and led to the intersection of the three-distance crossing in front of the Yellow-gun, Chang Chang-gun, Gyeongnam-do, at a visible speed from the yellow-do, to the high-speed speed.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system and accurately manipulating the steering and steering system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to enter the intersection by failing to perform his/her duty at the front direction of the vehicle of the Defendant, thereby driving the victim D (58 Does) who has come to the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant at the right side of the direction of the vehicle of the Defendant into the front part of the E-do si, which was driven by the victim D (58 Does).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, such as dynasium and tensions, and the injury to the victim F (77 years old) who took advantage of the damaged vehicle for about 3 weeks of medical treatment, such as brain synasium in need of approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim G (73 years old) in need of approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, the injury to the hynasium in need of approximately 17 years of medical treatment to the victim H (17 years old), the injury to the hynasium in need of approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim I (16 years old), and the injury to the victim J (69 years old) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle for about 3 weeks of medical treatment, such as brain synasium in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement of I, H, F, G and J;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate for inspecting the maintenance of motor vehicles;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and the report on a traffic accident;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field records of traffic accidents;

1. Handling of traffic accidents under the relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;