2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant reflects the crime of this case in depth, the total amount of damage is equivalent to 5 million won, and the defendant did not go to life, and led to the crime of this case since he did not go to his life after his release, it is necessary to respect the judgment of the court below because there is no change in sentencing conditions compared with the court below since new sentencing data have not been submitted at the court below. The defendant has the record of being sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime and has been sentenced several times, and more than two months have passed since he had been released from prison due to the crime similar to the crime of this case. Furthermore, the crime of this case was repeated in the period of repeated repeated crime of the repeated crime of this case, there is no possibility of agreement with the victims or reimbursement of damage, and there is no possibility of agreement with the victims. In full view of the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, the situation and result thereof, the defendant's personality and behavior, environment, age, etc. of the defendant, and various circumstances in the records and arguments of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.