2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was in office as a prosecutor from January 1, 2009 to July 2009 and retired from office after going to July 2009, and thereafter served as an attorney-at-law at a law firm Barun from September 2009 to June 2017. 2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) published an online newspaper called “D” (website: E) and Defendant C is a reporter of Defendant Company’s political division.

B. Around 10:21 on December 24, 2016, the background of the news report, as the title “G” No. 1419, which is the main place of the report, was a multiple testimony that “I received USD 200,000 from the president of the JK in 2005 and USD 30,000,000 ($ 280,000) in total from around 207, and KRW 230,000 ($ 280,000) from around 209. At the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, the article was reported that “I covered the above suspicion, even though I became aware of the suspicion.”

C. On December 26, 2016, the Defendant Company reported the Defendants’ news articles posted the article of the same content as indicated in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant article”) written by Defendant C along with the O (the senior legal team leader) and P (the senior legal team leader) who is a reporter of the Defendant Company, in the political aspect of D’s website, as the N’s title “N” was included in the political aspect of D’s website. Of the instant article, the part that the Plaintiff is at issue is as follows.

A The chief of F is confirmed to have done so by the end of "I tension.... the receipt of money may only be about to do so by the end of "I will be the President....."

The article 1 of this case stated that “The parties concerned, who had taken a direct speech from the head of the A preceding father, had the former head of the A, “The former head of the Department, in his own admission, would have fluencing 300 million won to I.”

A Attorney-at-law shall be the contents of the second article of this case.