성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the person who requested the attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The punishment (five years of imprisonment, 120 hours of order to complete a program) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) is too unreasonable.
B. Prosecutor 1) The sentence sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant, which was unfair in sentencing, is too uneasible and unfair.
B) It is unreasonable for the lower court to exempt the Defendant from disclosure and notification orders, in the absence of special circumstances to not disclose or notify the Defendant’s personal information, which is improper to exempt the Defendant from disclosure and notification orders.
2) It is unreasonable for the lower court to dismiss the Defendant’s request for the attachment order of this case even if the part of the request for attachment order is likely to recommit a sexual crime
2. Determination on the part of the case of the defendant
A. Each of the instant offenses committed by the Defendant and the Prosecutor regarding each of the instant offenses is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, such as: (a) rapes the victim (the victim (the victim from 13 to 15 years of age) who is a juvenile, committed a similar rape, forced indecent act, and the nature of the crime and method of committing the instant offense; (b) sexual identity and values are extremely poor; (c) the victim, who is at the age of forming a new sexual identity and values, suffered a great mental suffering and a sense of sexual humiliation; and (d) it seems difficult to easily cure the psychological suffering and suffering; (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victim; and (d) the mother of the victim and the victim wanted to severely punish the Defendant at the lower court and the trial.
On the other hand, when the defendant was found to have committed each of the crimes of this case against his wrongness, and the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for sexual crimes is favorable to the defendant.
The above circumstances and other circumstances.