자재비
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance along with the evidence added by this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.
Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is that the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” as the “Defendant”, the “subcontract 13” as the “subcontract 13,” and the “subcontract 13 as the “subcontract 13,” and the Plaintiff’s assertion added or emphasized by this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the following judgment as to the assertion that the Plaintiff added or emphasized by this court, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Determination on addition
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that: (a) around May 2, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied H beams equivalent to KRW 210,000,00 (including value added tax, and KRW 208,05,507) from I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”); and (b) requested the Defendant to manufacture steel materials at the neben site at KRW 121,470,000 (including value added tax, and KRW 133,617,000) for the process of manufacturing steel materials; (c) produced steel materials at KRW 343,617,00 (including value added tax, KRW 210,00,000, KRW 130,000, KRW 617,000, KRW 00, KRW 3000, KRW 3000, KRW 3000, KRW 600, KRW 3000, and KRW 300,00,00.
(b) Determination Correspondings, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 6 and 11 (including serial numbers) may be recognized by considering the overall purport of the pleadings.