beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.09 2016가단5118403

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. In the Land Survey Board prepared during the Japanese Occupation Period, it is indicated that the country was determined by the GJ 2,816 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi City (hereinafter “instant land prior to the instant subdivision”).

B. On November 15, 1957, the land prior to the instant subdivision was partitioned into the real estate listed in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 of the [Attachment List] as well as the Gyeonggi-do E, Gwangju-do, 826 square meters, and 462 square meters before the F.

C. On January 7, 1995, the statement is written as G at the end of the statement on the issue of the settlement of land price securities, and the distribution farmland division is written as if it were distributed to H the 826 former E of Gwangju-gun among the land before the instant partition to H, and F the 462 former E to I, and is written as G in the compensation column.

The registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Republic of Korea on July 18, 1974 with respect to each land listed in paragraphs (1) and (3) of the attached list shall be completed on October 10, 1958 with respect to each land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Republic of Korea on each land listed in the attached list shall be completed on December 29, 1973, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the J shall be completed on July 24, 1974 on each land listed in the attached list as of December 21, 1974, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant B shall be completed on October 22, 1974 as of October 22, 1974.

On the other hand, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of Defendant C was completed on June 19, 1987 by the reason of sale on June 18, 1987.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 7 (including virtual number), Eul's 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The land owner prior to subdivision of this case should be deemed G at the time of the enforcement of the Farmland Reform Act, as the prop of the instant land prior to subdivision was written G on the part of the distribution farmland register, the case related to the application for compensation prepared in relation to the prop compensation.

B. G, the father of the plaintiff, has an address in Gyeonggi-do KK.

참조조문