The appeal is dismissed.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of all of the instant crimes; (b) the personal and material damage inflicted by the Defendant on the victims appears to be relatively minor; and (c) the Defendant was aged and the neighboring neighbors have cut off their reputation.

However, in light of the following: (a) the crime of this case committed by the Defendant, while driving without a license, went away from the scene without any particular measure even though the Defendant suffered personal and material damage due to negligence; and (b) the nature of the crime is not good; (c) the victim was unable to agree with the victim up to the trial; (d) the damaged vehicle was in an insurance state; and (e) the victim was deemed not to have been recovered from damage; (c) the Defendant had the same criminal power; (d) the sentence of the lower court constitutes the minimum statutory penalty; and (e) all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) the circumstances before and after the crime, it cannot

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.