If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 23, 2016, the Defendant reported that he/she was fighting in front of B commercial convenience stores B in the light of the Gyeonggi Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Mabro-Ma

C. Maz. Maz. Maz. Maz.

C. The Mazackers No. A, Mazackers

C. Epargue H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, D, and F;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is that the crime of this case is a bad character in light of the motive and background of the crime, the occupation and number of victims, the duration of the crime, etc.

The defendant has been punished by a number of fines for violent crimes, as well as one punishment due to robbery.

The punishment of summary order is not heavier than all.