If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant around 04:00 on February 29, 2020, around 04:0, around 15, around the main points of “C” located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul.

“A police box belonging to the Incheon Western Police Station, which received a report on 112 and dispatched to the site, asked the Defendant “I have received a report, but you will be son?” The police box called “I am am am am amb, I am amb,” and assaulted the Defendant “I amb, I am at the end of the police box, I am am on the left side of the police box E at one time.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing violence and damage photographs to police officers dispatched to each police officer's statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. There is a high possibility of criticism in that the act of obstruction of the performance of normal performance of official duties, which is disadvantageous to the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, may promote a light of the law and order and the public authority, and there is a need for strict punishment.

The damaged police officer is punished for the defendant.

The defendant's mistake is recognized in favor of the favorable normal defendant.

The Defendant is an initial offender who has no criminal record.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime was committed, etc.