However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is between the victim C and the elementary school.

On March 30, 2012, the Defendant stated that “E” in the “E’s operation of the victim’s sports territory in the Hosong-gu, Ho-si, Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant would operate the private sports territory in the Philippines, which would be a considerable amount of money.” B, who paid money, would be able to operate the Internet sports territory in the Philippines.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to operate the private Internet sports climate in the Philippines.

The Defendant, on April 7, 2012, received a total of KRW 10 million from the victim, KRW 55 million on April 18, 2012, and KRW 74.9 million on May 3, 2012 from the victim to the account in the name of one bank in the name of the Defendant, respectively, for the purpose of preparing private Internet sports soil.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit transactions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Considerations such as the reflection of the defendant, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, and the fact that there is no same electric power