손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The fact that there is no dispute over the basic fact (based on recognition), Gap evidence 1 through 4, and 9 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, the result of physical examination conducted by this court on the Mayor of the Seoul Plung University, the whole purport of the arguments;
A. The Plaintiff’s past the instant surgery 1) The Plaintiff was a woman who was born in 1964, and was fluorous with respect to the escape from the 4-5 conical signboards around 1999, and around January 17, 201, which was operated by the Defendant, the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Danea department (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).
(2) At the time of the Plaintiff’s internal examination, the Plaintiff complained of the serious pain on the left-hand side at the time of the Plaintiff’s internal examination, and as a result of the IMI’s examination, the symptoms of spawning on the left-hand side were observed, and as a result, the CRI’s examination showed that the 5th anniversary of the left-hand side, the 1,000-spawning escape certificate, and the spawning pressure was observed. (2) After the Plaintiff’s symptoms have deteriorated even when receiving non-saturical treatment at a female organ, etc. at the Atol University, the Plaintiff applied the Defendant Hospital again on September 7, 201.
3) At the time of the Plaintiff’s visit, the Plaintiff was faced with a axis of his guardian, and thus entered the Defendant hospital. The Defendant complained against the Plaintiff that it was difficult to walk for at least five minutes due to heavy pain and scam, etc., and planned the Plaintiff to take a 5th century and the 1,000 square meters, etc., and the Defendant hospitalized the Plaintiff. B. (1) On September 8, 201, the Defendant carried out an operation against the Plaintiff, etc. (i) from 06:10 to 07:30 on September 8, 2011, the Defendant carried out the 5th century with respect to the Plaintiff, the 1,000 square meters in the latter part, and the 1,000 square meters in the latter part (hereinafter “instant operation”).
2. On September 9, 201, at around 06:00, the Plaintiff removed catherterization, and on the same day, at around 10:00, the Plaintiff was recovered to a certain extent in the instant surgery.
Therefore, the defendant appealed to the minor low-water storage and eating, etc. that the plaintiff did not left on the left, but it is possible to observe the progress of the outpatient treatment.