2. Although the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that he had been punished four times for the same crime in the past, and the crime of this case includes not only the crime of phiphone medication but also the crime of issuance of phiphones, and considering the fact that the crime of this case is very serious, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.