At around 00:20 on January 27, 2019, the Defendant: (a) took a dispute with one another on the grounds that the conduct of the Victim D (year 22) in the “C” restaurant located in Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, caused himself to be bad; (b) took a look at a hicker’s hand, kiding a hicker, leaving the hicker’s disease on the part of the hicker, leaving the hicker’s disease on the part of the hicker, leaving the hicker’s disease on the part of the hicker; and (c) threatened the hicker’s behavior, and the hicker’s resistance led the victim to the left face of the hicker; and (d) inflicted an injury on the part of the hicker, such as the face and the part of the hicker’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement of D or E;

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the defendant shouldered the main illness and inflicted bodily injury on the victim by breaking the victim's face. The act is very dangerous behavior, and the face and part of the body suffered by the victim is obvious that the victim may inflict bodily injury on the victim, and that the part and part of the face and part of the part of the victim was so obvious that the victim may inflict bodily injury on the victim, and that the part and part of the victim suffered is not less light of the nature of the crime, it is reasonable to impose strict liability.

However, there are circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, and conditions before and after the crime, in the following cases: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected against the defendant; (b) the father of the defendant who cares for the defendant is suffering from the incurable cerebrovascular and franchising mental illness; (c) the father of the defendant is not sufficient to health; and (d) written a written statement of agreement implementation; and (e)