However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim D (51, 51, 2, 2, and 2) who was the subject of criminal punishment of the Defendant on the loan business of the Madon-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Each investigation report (on-site photographs, telephone search against D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. In light of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) and the fact that the motive for the instant crime and the disabled are violence against the person, and the same kind of crime are continuously repeated, the necessity for strict punishment is also observed, and the necessity for strict punishment is too late, it is against the victim, it is agreed with the victim, the Defendant’s age, family environment, support relationship, etc., and the execution of the sentence is suspended.