2. The judgment has a record of having been sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime several times, and even if the sentence of imprisonment was imposed two times, the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime again during the repeated crime period, and that the defendant did not cooperate in the trial procedure, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the amount of damage in this case is a small amount, and the amount being used by the victim is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.