beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.05.24 2013고단1015

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반

Text

1. Defendant U.S. shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

Items 1 through 18 of seized evidence shall be respectively from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】

1. On May 31, 201, Defendant U was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on September 28, 2011.

2. On June 25, 2010, Defendant B was released on March 30, 2011 and the parole period expired on May 19, 201, when he was sentenced to one year by the Incheon District Court for violating the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

U generally manages a non-trade-free game site under the ground of the Z building in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is operated by the kind of Y, and if the police is controlled, the term "business president" is called as "the head of the business office". Defendant B is the head of the business office "the head of the business office" who plays a role of gathering customers who have performed the speculative game in the above game site, and AA is the "crym" in which AA resides outside the game site and plays a role of avoiding crackdown, and Defendant V and W are the employees who live outside the game site and exchange them with the heart and exchange of customers within the above game site.

From August 4, 2012 to August 20:10, the Defendants conspired with Y from August 4, 2012, up to August 20, 2012, installed 40 game for “self-learning” game in the above speculative game, and let many unspecified customers put 10,000 won in the above game machine, and automatically play the game. If the game is opened on the screen of the game machine, the Defendants, from 100,000 points to 40,000 points, and from 50,000 points to 5,000 points to 1,00,000 points to 1,00 points to 5,00 won per point, were exchanged.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with Y to engage in speculative activities by using speculative gaming machines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of AA;

1. Each statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation (on-site conditions, etc.);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous Records: The inquiry letter (No. 22, 24) of reference, the investigation report (No. 31, 42) of reference, the personal identification and the status of confinement shall be applied to the Acts and subordinate statutes.