beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.31 2017고단1225

업무방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million on February 13, 2017 by the Incheon District Court due to interference with the business of the victims in a restaurant operated by the victims under the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Apartment apartment shop.

1. On February 16, 2017, from around 17:00 to around 17:50 of the same day, the Defendant displayed the summary order to the victim and his family members at the window dressing point operated by the victim D in the above C apartment building from around 17:00 to around 17:50 of the same day, and was sentenced to a fine due to width, and was boomed at the office of reduction of one year and six months.

The term "as it means a large sound, and as the father of the victim requires that the victim's father take out of the above ad hoc store," N. N. i.i., the victim has suffered a special e.g.

I see the reported report, I am special? I am special? I am special;

I see human beings, I am legally, I am, I am chron, I am gue, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am

It interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as putting the disturbance "......"

2. On February 16, 2017, from around 18:00 to around 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant shown a summary order to the victim in the “cafeteria” restaurant operated by the victim E in the above C apartment building, while displaying the summary order to the victim.

The report was punished by fine, which prevents the business.

The victim interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as referring to a large sound, referring to a public bath, etc.

3. On February 16, 2017, from around 19:30 to 20:30 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, i.e., e., e., “a fine of KRW 3 million by filing a low-year report.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each simplified statement of D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (a wooden statement);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;