beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.12.11 2015고단1648

특수절도등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. In order to operate a business by establishing a legal entity of the remote lifelong education institute C called “C” with a personal job offering B, the Defendant was willing to borrow money from the bond company with the name of B, which was operated by himself/herself, as security, with the recognition of B’s personal seal impression and seal keeping the business.

On September 2014, the Defendant sent B’s seal to the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, the column of each letter and written consent, the column of the vehicle custodian, the column of the letter and written consent, the column of the delegation of the power of attorney, the column of the delegation of the power of attorney, the column of the obligor, the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, the column of the obligor, the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, the column of the obligor, and the column of the buyer of the vehicle, the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, the column of the obligor, the column of the vehicle transfer certificate, and the column of the seller of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant used B's seal unlawfully for the purpose of exercising it.

B. The Defendant, who is an illegal user, borrowed KRW 12.5 million from the bonds company on the name of the above company, who is aware of the fact of illegal use at the time and time indicated in the paragraph (a), and exercised the documents affixed with the seals affixed thereto as if they were duly formed.

2. Defendant B, as described in paragraph 1, knew that Defendant A transferred the said vehicle under his name to the bond company as collateral and that the possession of the vehicle under his name is transferred to the victim E., Defendant B was aware of the fact that Defendant B’s place of violation of the parking and stopping regulations stated in the notice of imposition of administrative fines, which was served by Defendant B’s house, is a F apartment off, with the view to finding the said vehicle around the above place.

Defendants conspired on April 20, 2015, the market price of KRW 20 million in the possession of the victim E in front of the F apartment way in the front of the Y2-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on April 20, 2015.