When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who works as an employee at the DMoel located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as an employee.

On July 12, 2014, between 02:28 and 02:30, the Defendant opened the doors of the above Moel 301 where the victim E (the age of 33) is lodging between 02:28 and 02:30, and opened the doors of the above Moel 301, which the victim covered.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed upon the Defendant’s room occupied by the victim.

(In the facts of prosecution, the part of the "the defendant divided the above 301 xel into 2 and confirmed that the victim was locked by confirming that he was locked, and the victim was locked by covering the victim's body with the aim of committing an indecent act against the victim." However, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was insufficient to recognize that the defendant was locked by the victim's body, and that the defendant got into the telecom for the purpose of committing an indecent act against the victim's body, and there is no other evidence to recognize otherwise. Thus, even if this part was deleted, it cannot be deemed that there was a substantial impact on the basic element of the facts charged that intrudes upon the victim's body against the victim's will, so the criminal facts are corrected ex officio

1. Legal statement of witness E in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Protocol of inspection by this Court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as CCTV photographs and interior photographs of guest rooms;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;