When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is in the process of divorce with the victim B.

1. The facts at a coffee shop where the Defendant’s trade name at around February 8, 2014 at which it is impossible to know, is not the mother of the said victim, but the victim was so called “sphone” to another male, or did not have any fact between another male and the telecom, etc., then C and D “B’s surbine” must be called “B.

“,” and “B, I am well fly fly,” and “I am fly,” respectively.

Until four new walls, they enjoy in Eelel.

F The difficulty of "F" is due to the settlement of money.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts with the words “,” etc.

2. Around September 19, 2017, the Defendant called the above F’s wife G, and called the Defendant “B” and called the Defendant “B”, so it was late to go into the closed teledeing telede, so it was difficult for the Defendant to do so.

knee kneel kneelelel, knee knee kneelel in that kneel.

In addition, it is called that the photographer photograph is subject to bandoning.

Data Nam-ro

Along with the fact that the above victim did not go beyond F, the victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly alleging that “I am deadly, I am deadly, and am deadly, I am deadly, and am deadly, I am dead by publicly alleging that “I am deadly, I am dead, and am deadly, so I am dead.”

[In relation to Article 2 of the facts charged, the prosecutor charged all the remarks of the defendant stated in the relevant facts charged with the crime of defamation by expressing false facts.

However, as examined in the “not guilty portion” of the facts charged in question, the part of the “not guilty portion” is determined based on facts in light of the witness F’s testimony, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 201).