However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 15, 2014, at around 11:45, the Defendant brought about a dispute with the victim on the ground that the Defendant had driven a vehicle parked by the victim while his/her father and son were parked, in front of the residence of the victim D (the age of 32) located in Busan metropolitan area C.

After coming from the above victim's play in the vicinity of his residence, the defendant saw the victim with the victim's left hand, he saw the victim's scam on one occasion, and saw the victim's scam, scam, scam, and scam on one occasion on one occasion, and sustained the victim's 56-day medical treatment, such as internal scambling, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (excluding the cases where the damage is not light, but has no previous record of the same kind, and deposit of some funds, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;