However, the execution of imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant and the Victim C (Y, 47 years of age) were living together, and the Defendant committed violence to and entered the victim even before the instant case, and was subject to a disposition that was not entitled to prosecution due to the victim’s expression of intent not to punish the victim.

피고인은 2016. 8. 27. 05:50경 서울 동대문구 D에 있는 ‘E여관’ 1층 108호에서, 피해자와 함께 술을 마시던 중 피해자가 자신의 여자 문제에 관한 이야기를 한다는 이유로, “씹할 죽어.”라고 말하면서 그곳에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 맥주병을 집어 들어 피해자의 머리 부위를 1회 내려치고, 쥐고 있던 깨진 맥주병으로 다시 피해자의 머리 부위를 1회 내리친 다음, 주먹으로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 수차례 때리고, 발로 피해자의 성기 부위를 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the victim, where the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police record regarding C;

1. A detailed statement on handling 112 reported cases;

1. Application of the respective visual Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim's upper part, each photographic image, and the field photographic image;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the point that is not erroneous and the victim's intention not to punish)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act with regard to suspended execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;