2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was living together with his female living together for a considerable period of time, that the defendant committed the crime of this case in which he was suffering from poor living conditions, and that there was no significant damage to the defendant. However, the crime of this case was committed in violation of the quality of the crime, such as theft of cash by intrusion upon the defendant's restaurant at night due to his possession of the key to the entrance of the restaurant that he had previously worked. The defendant was punished for the same crime of this case more than ten years prior to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for night time on September 12, 2012 (one suspended sentence of imprisonment and one fine once) and there was the record that the defendant committed the crime of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of which the defendant was punished more than two years prior to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor on September 12, 2012 (one-time suspension of sentence, one fine and one time).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.