However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on April 3, 2009, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the same crime in the same court on January 10, 2012, and thus violated the prohibition of drinking regulations on two or more occasions.

Nevertheless, around 00:04 on July 12, 2017, the Defendant driven CSS125 Obaba in the state of alcohol alcohol content of 0.214%, while under the influence of alcohol, from the front of the influent restaurant in the Dong-dong, Daejeon to the 73rd place of Dong-ro, Dong-ro, Daejeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol, a statement on the circumstances of the driving driver, and a report on internal investigation;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (Attachment to a summary order of the same paper);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act of the Order to Attend a lecture: A person who is engaged in driving as a business and repeated driving of drinking without any delay; (b) a high blood alcohol concentration figure of 0 favorable circumstances: A confession and reflect of a crime; (c) no damage has occurred due to a crime; (d) a person who has no record of crime exceeding fines; and (e) a punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the distance and driving distance of the above 0, the Defendant’s age, occupation, family relationship, economic conditions, sex behavior, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime.