beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.09.03 2019나15489

손해배상(기)

Text

Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked and the plaintiff's claim corresponding thereto shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts are the village creation of the Ulsan-gun C apartment in Ulsan-gun (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and the Plaintiff is a resident of the same apartment as the Defendant, who moved to the village head as a candidate for the village head election ( February 12, 2017) before the election day.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that ① (a) the Defendant had no previous record on the Plaintiff twice at the end of January 2017 and at the beginning of February 2017, the front election, but at the meeting of the instant apartment management office, the head of the instant apartment management office, “A (Plaintiff) who was a candidate for the village head at the same time had a previous record of his/her offense, and the son was able to have four and the son was scoo even scood.” This means whether there was no way to confirm the previous record of his/her offense, and even around February 14:40, 2017, he/she made a telephone conversation with D and made a statement to the same purport.

② On February 1, 2017, the president of the apartment building of this case stated false facts to “A is a person having criminal records, and privacy is complicated and complicated, and it does not have any problem.”

③ At the beginning of February 2017, at the same place where the representative F of the apartment building of this case, and auditor G, “A is a person who was a previous criminal, and male relations are complicated, so his or her private life is complicated, and thus, he or she is not entitled to this Chapter.”

The defendant's act seriously undermines the plaintiff's reputation. Accordingly, the plaintiff was placed in a situation where it is difficult for the plaintiff to live in the apartment of this case.

The defendant is obligated to compensate for the money stated in the claim as consolation money for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff.

B. The evidence presented as shown in the Plaintiff’s assertion contains each of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1, but on the other hand, the above evidence and the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 are written.