beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.09.10 2015누39080

요양급여비용삭감처분등취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment except for the following changes:

(A) The grounds alleged by the Defendant in the trial at the time of appeal are different from those alleged in the first instance court. However, even if considering the evidence additionally submitted by the Defendant in the trial, it is not different from the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court. On the 6th instance judgment, the “Hin disease” in the first instance court No. 8 and the “Hinlilty disease” in the first instance court No. 5 are changed into “Hin disease,” respectively.

Part 18 of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to "201."

The respective "AH" of the 20th, 4, 5th, 23th, 20, and 21th, shall be changed to "K".

Part 23 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended to "abscisonment" in Part 18.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.