The defendant visited the land construction work in Korea as a housing issue, but did not work as his own intention, and raised complaints.

On December 11, 2017, at the office of “Korea Land Corporation” located on the sixth floor of the National Pension Service 358 National Pension Service, the Defendant saw the above office to contain approximately five literss of gasoline in the oil tank purchased at the previous office of the Korea Land Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Land Corporation”) on December 11, 2017, on the ground that he did not enter his horse while looking at the above office and talking about the problem of housing, he moved the gasoline in a boom prepared in advance to the employees and the civil petitioners who prepared the gasoline in the above office, and then cut off the flus match with the said office.

When intending to attach fire, it was prevented by the above employees.

As a result, the Defendant prepared to purchase gasoline for the purpose of destroying a building in which those other than the Defendant are present by setting fire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the drilling letter (request for appraisal of ingredients of oil and written appraisal of evidence);

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act appears to have been caused by a crime, such as depressions, following the failure to prepare a new wife while the rental housing was to be removed by the defendant and his/her family, who had been living in his/her family.

However, the Defendant did not appear to have any reflective attitude against his mistake on the ground that the crime of this case was derived from the above one’s place of action, and rather, was a legitimate response to the decline of his own crime in the application for rental housing.