beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.28 2018나1606

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 5 and 6 as to the Plaintiff’s damage liability, the Defendant committed an assault on the Plaintiff’s right side of the Defendant’s house on December 3, 2016, on the ground that the Plaintiff, a caregiver at the Defendant’s house located in Goyang-gu, Yongsan-gu, 1207 and 1803, at the Defendant’s house located in Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, 1207, and 1803, with the right hand hand hand room for about one week medical treatment for the Plaintiff. The Defendant, around 10:00 on December 8, 2016, was issued a summary order with each of the above Defendant’s houses (hereinafter “the instant injury and assault”), and each of the above facts became final and conclusive by the Defendant’s each of the above acts (hereinafter “the instant summary order”). < Amended by Act No. 14830, Jul. 21, 2017; Act No. 15065, Jul. 210, 20, 2005>

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the injury and assault of this case as a tort.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, active damages 1), the Plaintiff’s medical expenses and medicine expenses incurred in D Hospital, E, and F, from December 10, 2016 to December 26, 2016 (i.e., medical expenses and medicine expenses incurred in F, (ii) KRW 206,610, in total (i.e., medical expenses and medicine expenses incurred in December 10, 2016) (i.e., KRW 123,10,00 on December 13, 2016; KRW 17,500,000 on December 13, 2016; KRW 9,900 on December 14, 2016; KRW 19,700 on December 15, 2016; KRW 10,000 on October 16, 2016, 2016; and

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff also sought medical expenses payment after February 2017. However, in light of the facts acknowledged earlier, the degree of injury and assault in the instant case, and the Plaintiff’s diagnosis for approximately seven days of complete custody, etc., the Plaintiff’s medical treatment was conducted after December 26, 2016.