beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.11 2014가합103696

퇴직금 등 청구의 소

Text

1. The defendant stated the same list as the plaintiffs listed in the list of the cited amounts by the plaintiff in attached Form 2, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that runs an insurance business, such as fire insurance, damage insurance, etc., and the plaintiffs were working as the defendant's cross-project manager, the vice head of the cross-project, the head of the fostering team, etc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "inter-road project manager,

B. The Defendant’s insurance organization and business division 1) The Defendant’s insurance organization basically consists of regional headquarters, branch office, place of business (general office, general office, and intersection office) under the regional headquarters. (No branch is established in any area including Gangwon-do.)

2) Of the above, the cross-office refers to an insurance solicitor who engages in non-life insurance sales activities with 100 to 300 cross-designers’ life insurance sales activities or third insurance sales activities. 2) The cross-office manager, as the general manager of the cross-office, is responsible for the management of the cross-contractor, and the director of the cross-office; the director of the cross-office; the director of the cross-office; and the head of the fostering team, as the head of the cross-office, took charge of the training

C. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant’s contract 1) concluded a contract with the Defendant around 2006 and around 2011, and the major contents thereof are as shown in the attached Form 4 contract clause. 2) The Plaintiff among the Plaintiffs, separate from the insurance solicitor appointment contract.

5. The rest of the Plaintiffs except B and D, who were commissioned as an insurance solicitor, entered into an agreement with the Defendant for the commission of the head of the cross-project (hereinafter “instant commission agreement”) at the time of their work. The main contents are as stated in the attached Form 4 contract.

3) The Defendant paid to the Plaintiffs fees based on the performance as an insurance solicitor (long-term contract management, long-term customer management, etc.).

The fees based on the evaluation of the performance of duties, such as the head of the intersection, have been paid every month, and the head of the intersection shall be the head of the intersection.