15,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

The Defendant was sentenced to eight months imprisonment on July 19, 2010 by the Seoul Southern District Court for the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on November 24, 2010 at the Southern Southern District Court of Seoul on November 24, 2010.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. On August 2012, the Defendant is expected to make a contribution to the victim D from the F office located in the F office operated by the Defendant on the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and the third floor around the Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, to make a contribution to the victim D to the SBS Rama’s main pay, and to make a contribution to the other broadcast.

A false statement was made that “The amount of money is KRW 20,000,000,000 to broadcasting-related persons and viewers.”

However, the Defendant did not have the ability to contribute the victim to the SBS D's main pay or other broadcast because he had no record of entertainment planning company operated by himself, and had no influence on the broadcast media, and had no intention or ability to use the money received from the victim as a means of living cost, debt repayment, etc., or had no intention or ability to use it as a contribution to the broadcast of the victim.

Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and acquired money of KRW 20 million from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of G, the Defendant’s wife, from the victim on the 24th day of the same month.

B. On September 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D at the F Office at the F Office at the end of the F Office at the end of the foregoing day, stating that “To have a smoked, the Defendant would have a horse riding or drink, and would pay KRW 10 million for teaching expenses as he/she is to receive a postponed class.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the damaged person as automobile purchase cost, other person's debt repayment and living cost, etc., and there was no intention or ability to use it for the victim's riding, drinking or postponed classes.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is a tuition fee from the victim.