2. Considering that the grounds for sentencing indicated in the instant argument and the record of the judgment, i.e., the Defendant’s criminal records exist, and that the Defendant’s business establishment that committed the instant crime was operated in the form similar to the instant crime for a short period of not less than one year, and during that period, it appears that the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been appropriately determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant, and that there are no special circumstances to the extent of changing the sentencing ex post facto, and therefore, the Defendant’s assertion

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.