Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant is acquitted.

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at around 15:14, Jun. 3, 2015, in the “E dental” operated by the victim D on the third floor of the sloping-gu C building in the Jeonsan-si, Jeonju-si, and the facts are stated as “G” and the facts charged by the victim D, but they are erroneous.

No confirmation was made that there was a causal relationship between the correctional treatment of the victim, and the victim did not have any operation of the medical record, but requested the victim to refund the medical charge and the surgery expenses, and 6 patients who were waiting in order to receive or receive the victim's medical treatment, and the victim was able to have the face after receiving the correctional treatment at this place.

A hospital shall undergo an operation at another hospital.

The physician operated the medical records photographs of our children at a low time, thereby openly impairing the honor of the victim, which means that the nurses directly changed the medical records.

2. On June 24, 2015, at the entrance to the “E dental building,” the Defendant’s fact was not confirmed as to the causal relationship between the Defendant’s face leap and the victim’s correctional treatment, which is the victim’s “E dental”. However, the E dental starts at 2 times among the “E dental” in 2010, and the face knifes came from one week before the 2010, and the face knife knifs came from one week before the 2010.

In the hospital, I require a leap operation.

The above contents were able to be seen not only by dental patients but also by those who passed the above while using the click box called the "sab" for medical treatment expenses.

In addition, from around that time to July 14, 2015, the Defendant cited a ticket with a patently false fact, such as the list in the attached crime list, and damaged the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the fact that he/she committed the same act as the facts stated in the judgment);

1. The witness D, H and F’s legal statement 1.