beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.05.10 2012고정984

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동퇴거불응)등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants live together with the defendants, and the victims D (the age of 52, the age of 52) and the defendants knew of the victim's house auction around February 9, 2012.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

A. From April 20, 2012, the Defendants: (a) around 11:20 on April 20, 2012; (b) around 11:20, at the home in which the victim was living, the date on which the victim promised to put the house at the end; and (c) the victim, who did not have any conversations, opened the house, opened the door door and talked, made several statements to the Defendants.

Defendants are required to leave the victim

In spite of the Gu, the victim's exclusion from the victim's office is deemed to be "I will live," and "I will go to what is," and the victim's exclusion from the victim's office for a hundred thousands.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

B. At around 17:00 on May 16, 2012, the Defendants found in order to receive a definite answer from the victim at the same place as “A” as “5.20” from the victim, and the victim would no longer be a compromise between the victim and the victim.

Defendants are required to leave the victim

Notwithstanding the Gu, the victim’s outlines to leave the victim for a several hundreds of time while referring to “the Chewing year” and “the Chewing baby” to the victim.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. Definating;

A. Defendant A, the above '1.b.

In the same time and place as “the victim had 5-6 community residents, such as F, etc., among the verbal disputes with the victim, openly insultd the victim, such as “the victim”, at a place where 5-6 residents of the community, such as F, etc., were located. B. Defendant B, at the same time and place as the above “1.b.,” Defendant B, on the ground that the victim took a bath to the Defendant A, on the ground that the victim took a verbal dispute with the victim at the place where F, among the verbal disputes with the victim, was made, insulting the victim by publicly insulting the victim, such as “hindo, too,” and “hin

Summary of Evidence

1..