사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[2019 Highest 490]
1. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents, without authority, shall hold an extraordinary general meeting of a clan B on February 26, 2016 and appoint a president A, a general secretary E, and an auditor and amend the articles of incorporation as an executive officer, with the title “resolution” within the certified judicial scrivener D office located in the former, the former, North, Military, and C around February 26, 2016, for the purpose of exercising authority to change the representative of the clan.
“S” is a clerical error in writing in the list of the members present at the meeting after printing the document.
hereinafter the same shall apply);
After recording the name of "H and I of the clan H and I of the clan, the seal of the F, G, H, and I voluntarily cleeped, shall be affixed to the name next to the name, and the title "B Protocol" shall include one chairperson, one secretary, and one auditor as the executive officers of the clan, the term of office of the executive officers of the clan shall be four years, and the term of office of the executive officers shall be four years, and shall not be reappointed on February 26, 2016.
“After printing out the documents, the name of “Audit F, Sejong, H, and F, G, H, and I” was written in the list of the members present at the meeting, and the seal affixed to the name of “F, G, H, and I,” which was arbitrarily dismissed. Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the letter of resolution in the name of F, G, H, and I concerning rights and obligations, and one copy of the letter of resolution in the name of F, H, H, and I, which is a private document concerning the certification of fact, in the name of F, H, H, H, and I. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant, at the former Jeju District Court’s registration office and registry office, had the name of the public official in charge of the registry office, who is unaware of the forgery of the document as referred to in paragraph (1), and had the name of the former public official in charge of the official in charge of the registration office, and had the Defendant present the name of the former public official in charge of the forest, forest, and forest, and forest, and forest, etc.