A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively, for Defendant B.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

A is the representative of the Dong-dong, Dong-gu, 504 Dong-dong, and the defendant B is the representative of the above apartment building 509 residents, and the relationship between the council of occupants' representatives and the above council of occupants' representatives with respect to heating works promoted by the council of occupants' representatives.

1. On July 8, 2015, Defendant B arbitrarily removed one copy of the written public notice, which is owned by the council of occupants’ representatives of the victim E-House, attached at entrance 509, at the entrance of the above E-House 509, and removed one copy of the written public notice from July 15, 2015 by the same method, around 04:09, and damaged the victim’s property twice.

2. Defendant A

A. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim H, who is the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, in the foregoing E Apartment Management Office, the head of the management office, F, B, and G, and publicly insulting the victim H, who is the president of the council of occupants’ representatives.

B. On June 19, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:09, removed at his/her entrance, one copy of a public notice, which is owned by the council of occupants' representatives of the victim E apartment, attached to the elevator bulletin board at the entrance of the above E apartment 504, and the same year.

6.26.Gyeongsungs:

7.4.Rabs; and

7.8.In the same manner, the notice was removed and the victim’s property was damaged four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The recording of statements by witnesses F and H in the second trial records;

1. The recording of statements by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. Images after a CCTV closure;

1. Determination as to the defendants and their defense counsel's assertion in the recording book (No. 49 of the Investigation Record), the USB recording file, the investigation report (the submission of additional data by the complainant and the suspect)

1. Defendant A’s insulting part of the insult of Defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that Defendant A had no performance in an insulting act.

According to the evidence adopted and investigated by this Court, Defendant A’s statement of “the same year” was made in the management office located in the management office, and the text of the management office was open at the time.