except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, continued to enter C’s station in Ulsan-gun B, Ulsan-gun, with alcohol around December 6, 2016.

When E, a police officer belonging to the Ulsan Coast Guard D police station, a police officer belonging to the Ulsan Coast Guard, called the Jeju Coast Guard 112 Report, requested home, the Defendant was unable to resist the disturbance due to the following reasons: (a) the Defendant sent to the house to the house, changed the 119 unit, changed the place of detention, and continued to move to the large interest.

E, by assaulting the Defendant’s disturbing act using smartphone (F), the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the mobilization of the report and the protection of the host, etc., by assaulting the Defendant’s disturbing act, such as creating a part of E’s arms by hand.

2. At the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1 of this Article, when the victim G, who is the police officer affiliated with the police box, such as the victim E, requests the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, the Defendant: “A bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, which is the same as the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit

It is also the bitch bit of bitch, which is created by only bitching bitching bitching bitching, etc., of the victim E, and the victim E is also the bitching bitching bitching of a bitching bitching bitching, with only the public book of the bitching bitching bitching.

Since Chewing sark’s sark, the victims expressed their desire, such as “Sarna,” and insulting them.

3. As referred to in paragraph 1 of damage to public goods, the Defendant, using smartphones set forth in paragraph 1, a case of public goods belonging to the main office of the National Police Agency, caused the Defendant to get off the part of the E’s arms on his hand on the ground that he taken and increased the Defendant’s disturbance by photographing video pictures.

Accordingly, smartphones have been destroyed to cover approximately KRW 127,00 for repairing costs due to a big damage, etc. from the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Mobile phones;