The Defendant was dismissed at the above general meeting of the Association around April 16, 2012, while performing the duties of the president of the Association, and the victim E was elected at the above general meeting as a new president of the Association from April 16, 2012, and had been performing the duties of the president of the Association.

When a new president of an association has been elected, the defendant shall transfer documents and equipment related to the official seal, books, passbooks, property, etc. of the association to the head of the association so that the head of the association can perform his/her duties, but the defendant shall transfer the above documents and equipment two times through the peremptory notice demanding the victim to transfer the above documents and property.

5.1.Before consideration, this was hidden in the defendant's house and the defendant's office did not return it to the victim, thereby impairing its utility.

A person shall be appointed.

2. The crime of concealing property is established in cases where discovery is difficult or impossible because the whereabouts of the property is unclear without legitimate authority, and thus the utility thereof is harmed. Thus, in cases where a person who has legitimate authority or reasonable ground to believe that the property is legally authorized is unclear, it cannot be said that there is the criminal intent of concealing property, and thus, the crime of concealing property is not established.

According to the health records and records as to the instant case, ① the head of the D Association was the Defendant, and held a special meeting for the purpose of dismissal of the president of the D Association on April 16, 2012; ② the Defendant did not present the grounds for dismissal of the president of the Association at the said special meeting; ② the Defendant did not have been given any opportunity to vindicate or vindicate his dismissal; and the Defendant’s dismissal of the president was resolved by the vote of the union members; ③ the Defendant asserted that the said special meeting was null and void; and ③ the Defendant filed an application with this court for the “provisional suspension of effect, etc.” suspending the effect of the said resolution of the special meeting, and did not transfer the documents and equipment related to the