The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The argument is asserted.

2. Determination

A. On April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim E, who was on board D-si, the head of the D-si operated by the Defendant, to take a back from the back seat; and (b) was set off from the vehicle to the head of the steering group; (c) thereby, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, who was on board the victim, and the victim, who was on board the victim, by taking approximately four weeks of the victim’s knives, such as “the victim’s knives of knife, the knife left left, the knife left-hand left-hand left-hand, and the knife, the knife.”

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by compiling the evidence as indicated in its judgment.

(c)

The following circumstances revealed by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. ① The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court below to the effect that “the victim forced the victim’s left side kacks by force,” and ② the photograph taken at the scene of the victim at the time, where the cream was worn out in the state where the victim was laid in the state where the victim was laid in the cream, and ③ the victim was inside the University Hospital Hospital Hospital of the Annual Generation on April 27, 2016, which was the day of the case, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the victim complained of the victim from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the victim took the cream at the right side of the victim’s hand,” and (b) the victim complained of the victim’s injury upon the victim.

full recognition may be accepted.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below convicting the facts charged of this case is justifiable.

3. The Defendant’s appeal is without merit.