The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment based on evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of Article 30(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., and the confiscation of each game machine of this case, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed, and thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the Defendants, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.