However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 20, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime on September 20, 2018: (a) around September 23:10, 2018; (b) on the street in front of the Cheongju-gu B apartment Cra, Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, with the report of 112 that “any fluor is in excess of his spirit; hereinafter the same shall apply); (c) the developments leading up to the area D Zone of the Y, the Y, the police station, and the police officer called “I am home from F; and (d) I am the Defendant’s drinking fry with the Defendant’s drinking fluor as the tax paid by the me; and (d) I am am her bling and she will do so more than twice.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

2. On September 20, 2018, the Defendant, around 00:0 on September 20, 2018, removed a suspect who spits down the Defendant’s future erosion with the intent of the F while committing an act of assaulting a police officer, such as the preceding paragraph, at the D District Unit of the Cheongju-si Police Station located in the area corresponding to the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and subsequently going to the police station.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for photograph explanation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The nature of the crime is very pleasure, spiting, spiting, or spiting the nature of the crime, such as taking a bath to police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, and spiting or spiting the nature of the crime. There is no criminal force against the Defendant. o and other sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are integrated into consideration the sentencing conditions.