A A A shall be punished by a fine of seven million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Defendant

B is a person who has engaged in the management of all the “F” buildings in Jeju Island, and the Defendant A is a person in charge of the electric power blocking when an application for the suspension of supply is received from an employee of the headquarters of the Jeju Electric Power Corporation.

Defendant

B decided May 18, 2015 to remove freezing facilities in F buildings, and requested the Korea Electric Power Customer Center to block electricity, and requested the victim H(53 tax) to remove freezing facilities, including electric installations in F buildings, around August 2015.

Defendant

A Upon receipt of the above request from Defendant B at the customer center, A visited F around May 21, 2015 and visited F to collect measuring instruments to measure electric consumption at the transformation room.

The route in which electricity is supplied to F buildings in the Korean Electricity construction in the Korea Electricity supply operator, was the ground closing machine for the part managed by the Korea Electricity Corporation in the order of “ground closing machine - mine closing machine - automatic closing machine (AS) - meter changing machine (MOF) - transformer- various facilities”. At the time of May 21, 2015, electricity was supplied to the automatic closing machine even before the automatic closing machine.

Therefore, Defendant A, who was in charge of the electric power blocking, had a duty of due care to prevent electricity supplied to the building by opening the paths between the ground opening and closing machine of the above building and the lightninger, and Defendant B, who was in charge of the entire building, had a duty of care to confirm whether the power supply blocking was properly conducted before the removal work of electric installations, or to request an expert of electric installations to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, Defendant A collected the measuring instruments of the above building and measured the volume of electric power used and did not take any measures for blocking electric power use, and thus, Defendant A left the supply of electric power until the automatic closing and closing date of the broken section for several months, and Defendant B.